ANOTHER Republican rape gaffe

Pennsylvania Senatorial candidate Tom Smith  is the latest Republican to make an unfortunate comment on rape, hot on the  heels of now notorious Missouri Representative Todd Akin.

At a press conference on Monday in  Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Mr Smith, a former coal mining magnate turned  political hopeful, that while he did not agree with Mr Akin, he did have a  zero-tolerance policy toward abortion, even in cases of rape.

He then referred to his own ‘experience’ of  his daughter’s choice to have a child out of wedlock, from consensual sex,  saying ‘It is similar… I’m pro-life, period.’

Gaffe

Gaffe: Pennsylvania Senatorial candidate Tom Smith,  left, is the latest Republican to make an unfortunate comment on rape, hot on  the heels of now notorious Missouri Representative Todd Akin

His representatives have declared that the  reports have taken his comments out of context, though transcripts of the event  leave little to interpretation.

Mr Smith is running on the Republican ticket  to outset freshman Democratic Senator Bob Casey in November.

Appearing at a luncheon at the Pennsylvania  Press Club, he spoke to reporters about Todd Akin’s comments on  rape.

‘What that congressman said I do not agree  with at all. He should have never said anything like that,’ he said, according  to PoliticsPA.

He went on to declare he was ‘pro-life,  period.’

Reporters followed up by asking how he might  approach a daughter or a granddaughter who was the victim of rape and became  pregnant.

‘I lived something similar to that with my  own family. She chose life, and I commend her for that,’ he said.

‘She knew my views. But, fortunately for me,  I didn’t have to.. she chose they way I thought. No don’t get me wrong, it  wasn’t rape.’

Reporters zeroed in on his comparison and  asked him how it was similar to rape.

‘Uh, having a baby out of wedlock,’ he  said.

‘That’s similar to rape?’ a reporter  asked.

‘No, no, no, but… put yourself in a father’s  situation, yes. It is similar. But, back to the original, I’m pro-life, period,’  he said.

‘I’m not going to argue about the method of  conception.’

His campaign has issued a rebuttal to the  coverage of his comments, saying that his statements were ‘less than  artful.’

‘Tom Smith is committed to protecting the  sanctity of life and believes it begins at conception,’ they said.

‘While his answers to some of the questions  he faced at the Pennsylvania Press club may have been less than artful, at no  time did he draw the comparison that some have inferred. When questioned if he  was drawing that comparison, Tom’s answer was clear, ‘no, no,  no.’’

Mr Smith’s prospects for wining the race were  already slim,  a Philadelphia Inquirer poll out Monday had incumbent Bob  Casey up 19 points, meaning these latest comments may finish the  race.

WHAT DO YOU THINK HE MEANT?  READ THE ENTIRE TRANSCRIPT BELOW:

Robert Vickers, Patriot News: In light of  Congressman Akin’s comments, is there any situation that you think a woman  should have access to an abortion?

Tom Smith:  My stance is on record and it’s very simplistic: I’m pro-life, period. And what  that Congressman said, I do not agree with at all. He should have never said  anything like that.

Vickers: So in cases of incest or  rape…

Laura Olson, Post-Gazette: No  exceptions?

Controversial: He then referred to his own ‘experience’  of his daughter’s choice to have a child out of wedlock, from consensual sex,  saying ‘It is similar… I’m pro-life, period’

Smith: No exceptions.

Mark Scolforo, Associated Press: How would  you tell a daughter or a granddaughter who, God forbid, would be the victim of a  rape, to keep the child against her own will? Do you have a way to explain  that?

Smith: I  lived something similar to that with my own family. She chose life, and I  commend her for that. She knew my views. But, fortunately for me, I didn’t have  to.. she chose they way I thought. No don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t  rape.

Scolforo: Similar how?

Smith: Uh, having a baby out of  wedlock.

Scolforo: That’s similar to rape?

Smith: No,  no, no, but… put yourself in a father’s situation, yes. It is similar. But, back  to the original, I’m pro-life, period.

[Another question on an unrelated  topic]

John Micek, Morning Call: Mr. Smith, can I  ask you to clarify one more time the question that Mark asked you. Did I just  hear you say that having a child out of wedlock is analogous to  rape?

Smith: No, I did not say that.

Scolforo: You did say that.

Micek: But you did say it,  sir.

(Noise as a Smith campaign aide sought to  answer, but Scolforo insisted Smith answer).

Scolforo: But you did say  that.

Smith: I said I went through a  situation.

Scolforo: With your daughter, with a  daughter.

Smith: Yes.

Scolforo: OK.

Smith: And  it’s very, very difficult. But do I condone rape? Absolutely not. Do I propose  life? Yes I do. I’m pro-life, period.

Scolforo: So what’s the similarity between  those two, in other words? Just that there’s a decision involved?

Smith: (Pause.) A  life is a life, and it needs protected. Who’s going to protect it? We have to. I  mean that’s, I believe life begins at conception. I’m not going to argue about  the method of conception. It’s a life, and I’m pro-life. It’s that  simple.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s